If you are applying to study law at a UK university, you may be wondering whether your LNAT multiple-choice score matters more than your essay. Should you focus most of your preparation on improving your score out of 42, or should you spend more time developing your essay-writing skills?
The answer is that both parts can matter, but their importance depends on the university you apply to.
The National Admissions Test for Law (LNAT) has two sections. Section A tests your ability to understand and analyse written passages through multiple-choice questions. Section B asks you to write an essay in response to one of three questions. Universities receive both parts and use them according to their individual admissions policies.
For students applying to UK law schools from Dubai or elsewhere in the UAE, understanding this difference can help you prepare more effectively and choose universities that suit your academic profile.
In this guide, we explain how the LNAT score and essay are assessed, what admissions tutors look for, how to improve both sections, and how to use your results when planning a UK law application.
The LNAT assesses skills that are important for undergraduate law, including reading comprehension, critical reasoning, interpretation and the ability to construct a clear argument. It does not test whether you have already studied law.
The test has two sections, each designed to assess different abilities.
| Feature | Section A: Multiple Choice | Section B: Essay |
|---|---|---|
| Main purpose | Assess comprehension and reasoning | Assess written argument and critical thinking |
| Questions | 42 multiple-choice questions | Choose one of three essay questions |
| Time available | 95 minutes | 40 minutes |
| Result | Score out of 42 | No single overall LNAT essay score |
| Marking | Marked by computer | Considered by participating universities |
| Main skills assessed | Interpretation, analysis and reasoning | Argument, structure, evaluation and written communication |
The current official LNAT format gives candidates 95 minutes for Section A and 40 minutes for Section B, making the complete test two hours and 15 minutes long.
Your LNAT multiple-choice score is the number of marks you receive from the 42 questions in Section A. This is the numerical LNAT score reported to candidates.
The questions are based on passages of text. You need to understand the information presented, distinguish supported conclusions from assumptions, identify arguments and evaluate what can reasonably be inferred from the passage.
For example, a question may present an argument about government policy, education or individual rights. You might need to identify the author’s main conclusion or determine which statement follows from the information provided.
The challenge is not simply reading quickly. It is reading accurately, identifying the relevant evidence and avoiding answers that seem reasonable but are not supported by the passage.
A higher LNAT score can strengthen an application at universities that place substantial emphasis on Section A. However, there is no single score that guarantees admission to every LNAT university.
The LNAT essay gives you an opportunity to demonstrate how you develop and communicate an argument.
You choose one question from three options and write your response within 40 minutes. The essay is not assigned a single central LNAT Consortium score in the same way as Section A. Instead, participating universities decide how to assess and use it.
Admissions tutors may look at whether you can:
Identify the central issue in a question.
Develop a clear and defensible position.
Consider alternative arguments.
Support claims with relevant reasoning and examples.
Organise ideas into a logical structure.
Reach a reasoned conclusion.
Communicate accurately and concisely.
You do not need to write like a practising lawyer. You need to demonstrate the analytical thinking, judgement and written communication expected of a prospective law student.
There is no universal answer because universities use the LNAT differently.
Some place significant emphasis on the multiple-choice score when deciding which applications should progress. Others use the essay as an important part of their academic assessment. Some consider both alongside grades, the UCAS application and other admissions information.
The LNAT Consortium explicitly states that there is no fixed weighting applied across all participating universities.
This means that students should not assume that a high multiple-choice score will compensate for a weak essay, or that an excellent essay will automatically make up for a lower score.
Your target university’s admissions policy is the most useful starting point.
Imagine a student achieves a strong Section A score but submits an essay with an unclear argument, limited evaluation and a poorly developed conclusion.
At a university that gives the essay considerable weight, these weaknesses may affect the application’s assessment even if the multiple-choice result is competitive.
A strong numerical score does not automatically demonstrate the ability to construct a persuasive written argument.
Consider another student whose essay demonstrates thoughtful reasoning, balanced evaluation and clear writing, but whose multiple-choice score is less competitive.
A university that places a substantial emphasis on Section A may still consider that score a significant weakness.
The essay may demonstrate valuable skills, but it should not be treated as a guaranteed substitute for a stronger multiple-choice result.
Both examples illustrate why a balanced preparation strategy is sensible. The precise impact of each section depends on the university’s selection process, and neither example predicts an admission outcome.
The goal is to develop both accurate reasoning under time pressure and the ability to communicate a well-supported argument.
Different universities have different selection methods. Checking the official admissions requirements for each university is more reliable than following a general online ranking of LNAT scores.
UCL provides a clear example of why both parts matter.
Its published admissions guidance explains that it uses a benchmark for the multiple-choice score, informed by results from previous applicant cohorts. Applicants who meet the relevant benchmark can then progress to further academic consideration.
UCL also states that admissions tutors assess the LNAT essay. The university describes the essay as a useful example of the candidate’s own writing and an opportunity to assess the ability to formulate, develop and defend an argument. It considers the LNAT alongside academic history and other application information.
What this means for applicants: do not prepare for UCL by concentrating exclusively on Section A. You need to understand the current benchmark policy and take essay preparation seriously.
Oxford uses the LNAT as part of its undergraduate Law admissions process. The test helps the university assess applicants’ reasoning and written argument alongside other application information.
The LNAT Consortium confirms that participating universities determine how they use both the multiple-choice result and the essay. Applicants should therefore consult Oxford’s official admissions guidance for the relevant entry year rather than assume a particular weighting applies everywhere.
What this means for applicants: prepare for both sections and check the current Oxford selection process before finalising your application strategy.
King’s College London is another participating LNAT university. Its admissions requirements should be checked directly for the course and entry year you are considering.
Do not assume that King’s uses precisely the same score benchmark, essay assessment or shortlisting process as UCL or Oxford. The LNAT Consortium confirms that universities have discretion over how they use the test.
The LNAT is also used by institutions including Bristol, Durham, Glasgow, LSE, SOAS and other participating universities. Requirements and selection methods differ, so applicants should verify the relevant course requirements with each institution.
Before applying, check:
Whether the LNAT is compulsory for your specific course.
The university’s current approach to multiple-choice scores.
Whether and how the essay is assessed.
Academic entry requirements.
Application deadlines.
Any additional requirements for international applicants.
Important: university policies and benchmarks can change between entry years. Use official admissions pages for the cycle in which you are applying.
The LNAT multiple-choice section is scored out of 42. However, there is no universal passing score, and a particular result does not guarantee an interview or offer. The LNAT Consortium confirms that universities use results according to their own admissions systems.
A score should therefore be interpreted in context.
For example, a result may be competitive for one university’s selection process but less competitive for another. The same result can also have a different practical significance depending on the applicant’s academic profile and the university’s approach to shortlisting.
When evaluating your score, consider three questions:
How does your score compare with relevant published information from your target university?
Does the university use a threshold, ranking system or another method of selection?
How strong is the rest of your application, including your academic qualifications and written work?
Avoid relying on unofficial claims that one score guarantees admission to Oxford, UCL, King’s or any other law school.
Set a target to guide your practice, but do not treat it as an admission guarantee.
Begin with a timed diagnostic test, identify the question types causing the most errors, and track your progress through further practice. Use official LNAT preparation materials to understand the test format and question style.
Your preparation should be based on measurable improvement rather than an arbitrary score prediction.
Section A requires a combination of comprehension, careful reasoning and time management. Simply reading more articles or completing large numbers of questions may not address the specific reasons you are losing marks.
A structured approach is more useful.
After reading a passage, summarise its main conclusion in one sentence.
Then identify the reasons the author uses to support it. This helps you distinguish the central argument from background information, examples and secondary points.
Some answer choices may sound plausible without being supported by the passage.
Ask yourself:
Does the text directly support this statement?
Is the answer based on an assumption?
Does it exaggerate what the author said?
Does it introduce information that is not provided?
This habit can reduce errors caused by choosing answers based on personal opinion rather than the passage.
After completing practice questions, investigate why each incorrect answer was tempting and why the correct answer is better supported.
Group mistakes into categories, such as:
Misunderstanding the main argument.
Missing a qualification.
Making an unsupported inference.
Confusing the author’s position with an example.
Spending too long on one question.
Reviewing these patterns helps you decide what to practise next.
Section A contains 42 questions to be completed in 95 minutes. You need to allocate time sensibly across the passages and avoid allowing one difficult question to consume too much of your available time.
Practise under timed conditions and use the review function strategically. Your aim is to answer accurately while keeping enough time for the remaining questions.
The official LNAT website provides information about the test format, preparation advice, sample questions and practice resources. These should form the foundation of your preparation.
Commercial courses or tutoring may offer structure and feedback, but no provider can guarantee a particular score or university admission. The LNAT Consortium itself does not endorse commercial preparation providers.
A strong LNAT essay is not simply a collection of sophisticated words or a long list of examples. It should demonstrate clear thinking, sound judgement and a logical argument.
You have 40 minutes to answer one of three questions. The official LNAT guidance recommends a maximum of around 750 words, with approximately 500–600 words often being suitable.
Read the question carefully before deciding your position.
Some questions ask whether you agree with a statement. Others ask you to discuss a policy, evaluate a principle or consider competing viewpoints.
Make sure your essay answers the question actually asked rather than a related issue you find easier to discuss.
You do not need to take an extreme position to produce a strong essay.
You should, however, have a clear central argument. If your position is conditional, explain the conditions that support it.
For example, a question about restricting personal freedoms might require you to consider public safety, individual rights, proportionality and the possibility of misuse.
Spend a few minutes outlining your argument.
A practical structure is:
Introduction: Identify the issue and state your position.
Body paragraph 1: Develop your strongest reason.
Body paragraph 2: Consider a counterargument or limitation.
Body paragraph 3: Evaluate the competing considerations and refine your position.
Conclusion: Answer the question directly.
This structure is a useful starting point, not a rigid formula. Adapt it to the question.
Critical thinking involves more than listing both sides of an issue.
Explain why an opposing argument may be persuasive, identify its limitations and show how it affects your own position.
For example, if you argue that a policy is necessary, consider whether it is proportionate, whether less restrictive alternatives exist and what unintended consequences might follow.
This demonstrates evaluation rather than simple description.
Relevant examples can make your reasoning clearer, but you do not need to fill your essay with statistics or detailed legal references.
The LNAT is designed to assess aptitude rather than prior knowledge of law. Focus on the quality of your reasoning and the relevance of your examples.
Reserve the final few minutes to check that your essay answers the question, follows a logical structure and communicates your ideas clearly.
Look for incomplete sentences, repeated points, unclear references and conclusions that do not follow from the argument.
Students often prepare unevenly when they focus too heavily on the score they can see and neglect the skills demonstrated by their essay.
Avoid these common mistakes:
Practising only multiple-choice questions. This leaves less opportunity to develop argument structure and written clarity.
Writing essays without reviewing them. Producing more essays is less useful if you never identify recurring weaknesses.
Memorising generic essay templates. A rigid structure can prevent you from answering the precise question being asked.
Using complicated vocabulary unnecessarily. Clear, accurate writing is more valuable than language that obscures your argument.
Assuming a high score guarantees admission. Universities consider the LNAT within their own selection processes and alongside other application information.
Ignoring university-specific requirements. A preparation strategy should support your target courses, not rely on assumptions about a universal LNAT cutoff.
Students applying from Dubai and elsewhere in the UAE should plan LNAT preparation alongside their academic commitments and UCAS application.
Start by identifying which universities require the LNAT for your chosen course and checking their entry-year deadlines. Then establish your current performance through a timed practice test.
A practical preparation plan can include:
Diagnostic assessment: Identify your strengths and weaknesses in both sections.
Targeted practice: Work on the multiple-choice question types that cause the most errors.
Essay practice: Write timed responses and review argument structure, clarity and evaluation.
Progress tracking: Record practice results and recurring essay weaknesses.
University research: Check current admissions policies and deadlines.
Final preparation: Complete timed practice and confirm your test arrangements.
Students balancing school examinations, predicted grades and university applications may benefit from a realistic timetable that allocates time to both LNAT sections.
Option Training Institute offers LNAT exam preparation in Dubai for students who want structured practice and support with multiple-choice reasoning and essay writing. Students considering a course should ask about the teaching approach, practice opportunities, feedback process and how the programme will be tailored to their needs.
Preparation should help you build skills and confidence; it should not be presented as a guarantee of a specific score or an offer from a particular university.
Coaching may be useful if you need help diagnosing repeated errors, improving your timing, planning essays or receiving structured feedback.
Before choosing a course, ask:
Does the programme cover both multiple-choice questions and essay writing?
Will you complete timed practice tests?
How will your progress be measured?
Will you receive specific feedback on your essays?
Does the programme adapt to your current strengths and weaknesses?
Are the claims about results realistic and transparent?
You should also use the official LNAT preparation resources, which are available without charge. The LNAT Consortium does not endorse commercial coaching providers, so students should assess any provider independently and be cautious of promises about scores or admission outcomes.
The LNAT multiple-choice score and essay serve different purposes. Section A provides a numerical measure of performance on comprehension and reasoning questions, while Section B allows admissions tutors to assess your ability to construct and communicate an argument.
Neither should be treated as a universal shortcut to admission.
For students applying to UK law schools, the most effective approach is to understand each university’s selection process, practise both sections under realistic conditions and use feedback to improve specific weaknesses.
If you are preparing for LNAT from Dubai or the UAE, a structured preparation plan can help you balance multiple-choice accuracy, time management and essay development.
Explore LNAT preparation at Option Training Institute to learn about available training options and discuss a preparation approach suited to your target universities and current skill level.
No. The score out of 42 comes from the multiple-choice section. The essay is provided to participating universities, which assess and use it according to their admissions policies.
Not at every university. Some institutions place substantial emphasis on the multiple-choice score, while others also give the essay considerable attention. Check the current admissions policy of each university you are considering.
You should not assume that it can. Universities use the two sections differently, and a strong essay does not guarantee that a lower multiple-choice score will be overlooked.
No. A high score does not guarantee an interview or an offer. Universities consider the LNAT alongside other application information and apply their own selection criteria.
Section A contains 42 multiple-choice questions based on passages of text, with 95 minutes available to complete them.
The official LNAT sample-essay guidance recommends a maximum of around 750 words, with approximately 500–600 words often being suitable within the 40-minute time limit. The quality and relevance of your argument matter more than reaching a particular word count.
No. The LNAT is designed to assess aptitude for studying law rather than knowledge of legal subjects. It focuses on skills such as comprehension, interpretation, reasoning and written argument.
Yes. Preparing for both sections is a sensible approach because universities receive the multiple-choice result and essay, although the relative importance of each depends on the institution.
Students in Dubai can explore LNAT preparation through Option Training Institute. Before enrolling, ask how the programme covers timed multiple-choice practice, essay planning, written feedback and progress assessment. You should also use the official LNAT resources when preparing.